SearchSkip Search
SearchSkip Search
בר ימניSkip בר ימני
main page contentSkip main page content

The Effect of a Series of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulations of the Motor Cortex on Centr

Whereas the pain alleviation induced by a single rTMS treatment is probably due to placebo, patients with SCI may benefit from a series of rTMS treatments.



30/09/2009

 

This work was supported by a grant from the Insurance Research Fund of the Association of Israeli Insurance Companies

Ruth Defrin, PhDThe Effect of a Series of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulations of the Motor Cortex on Central Pain After Spinal Cord Injury

 

Ruth Defrin, PhD, Leon Grunhaus, MD, Doron Zamir, MSc, Gabi Zeilig, MD

 

ABSTRACT. Defrin R, Grunhaus L, Zamir D, Zeilig G. Theeffect of a series of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulations of the motor cortex on central pain after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88:1574-80.

 

Objective: To study the analgesic effect of repetitive trans-cranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the motor cortex on central pain in patients with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI).

 

Design: Double-blind randomized controlled trial. Mean follow-up period was 4.5 weeks.

 

Setting: General hospital.

 

Participants: Twelve paraplegic patients due to thoracic SCI suffering chronic central pain (11 completed the study) who were randomly selected from a list of eligible patients.

 

Intervention: Real or sham 10 daily motor rTMS treatments (500 trains at 5Hz for 10s; total of 500 pulses at intensity of 115% of motor threshold) using figure-of-8 coil over the vertex.

Main Outcome Measures: Chronic pain intensity (visual analog scale [VAS], McGill Pain Questionnaire [MPQ]), pain threshold, and level of depression (Beck Depression Inventory).

 

Results: Both real and sham TMS induced a similar, significant reduction in VAS scores (P_.001) immediately after each of the 10 treatment sessions and in VAS and MPQ scores after the end of the treatment series. However, only real rTMS conferred a significant increase in heat-pain threshold (4°C, P_.05) by the end of the series. Most important, the reductionin MPQ scores in the real rTMS group continued during the follow-up period. Depression scores were equally reduced in both groups but similar to pain relief, depression continued to

improve at follow-up in the real rTMS group.

 

Conclusions: Whereas the pain alleviation induced by a single rTMS treatment is probably due to placebo, patients with SCI may benefit from a series of rTMS treatments.

 

 

Jump to page content